Add Row
Add Element
cropper
update

Provider Impact

update
Add Element
  • Home
  • Categories
    • Medicare + RTM
    • Pharmacy Insights
    • Provider Spotlights
    • HR & Staff Benefits
  • Featured Business Profiles
February 06.2026
3 Minutes Read

Medicare Drug Price Negotiations for 2028: Impacts on Healthcare Costs

Prescription bag symbolizing Medicare drug price negotiation.

Understanding the 2028 Medicare Drug Price Negotiations

On February 5, 2026, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) unveiled the latest group of drugs set for price negotiation under the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program, an initiative born from the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022. This third cycle involves 15 specific drugs, including Trulicity, Biktarvy, and Botox, as well as a renegotiation for Tradjenta. The selection process is designed to focus on those medications that have no generic alternative and are among the highest in total expenditures by Medicare.

The Process Behind Drug Selection

The inclusion criteria for negotiation specify that drugs must be single-source, meaning they have no generic counterparts, and certain products like orphan drugs are exempted. These selected drugs are chosen based on their total Medicare spending, a combination of their cost and the number of beneficiaries relying on them. This year, the total spending on these drugs approximated $27 billion, making up a significant portion of Medicare's budget.

Potential Savings from Negotiations

Based on data from previous cycles, the CMS estimates that if the previous round's negotiated prices had been applied in 2024, the program could have saved beneficiaries an impressive $12 billion. However, it's crucial to understand that these negotiations aim to save Medicare costs broadly, and individual beneficiaries might not immediately feel price reductions due to varying plan negotiations and cost-sharing structures.

What Changes Under the Inflation Reduction Act?

The IRA has introduced several pivotal changes aimed at enhancing Medicare affordability. These include capping insulin prices and establishing an out-of-pocket cap for beneficiaries. The implications of these reforms are promising for individuals grappling with expensive medications.

A Closer Look at Selected Drugs

Among the 15 selected drugs, there are several notable entries that point to ongoing trends in treatment. For instance, Glucose regulation medications like Trulicity highlight the growing focus on chronic conditions prevalent among Medicare beneficiaries. Other drugs include Enliven and Xolair, which are pivotal for managing autoimmune disorders and severe allergies.

Will Beneficiaries See Immediate Impact?

While the overarching goal of these negotiations is to drive down overall costs for Medicare, how this translates to real savings for individual beneficiaries can vary. Factors affecting this include the existing negotiated prices set by their Medicare plan and how those prices align with the newly negotiated Maximum Fair Price (MFP). Thus, while there may be a systemic decrease in drug costs, personal financial impacts can differ greatly.

Future Predictions: A Path to Greater Affordability?

As negotiations move forward, the potential for changes in other related programs looms large. With CMS exploring partnerships and models, the landscape for prescription drug pricing may significantly shift. Upcoming negotiations may also reveal insights into how effective the program will be at balancing cost control while ensuring beneficiaries have access to necessary medications.

Call to Action

For independent physicians and healthcare providers, understanding these negotiations is critical. They have a direct impact on treatment options available to patients and influence healthcare costs broadly. Engaging with your communities, advocating for accessible healthcare policies, and advising patients on potential changes in costs due to these negotiations can create a more informed patient base and contribute to community health awareness.

Medicare + RTM

1 Views

0 Comments

Write A Comment

*
*
Related Posts All Posts
01.30.2026

Why Medicare Rights Urges CMS to Center Beneficiary Needs in MA and Part D

Update Significant Changes Loom for Medicare Beneficiaries This week, a critical dialogue surrounding Medicare Advantage (MA) and Part D arises as Medicare Rights submits comments on the annual proposed rule for 2027 presented by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). While the proposed rule introduces some beneficial changes aimed at improving accessibility and transparency, it also reverses important safeguards previously established for beneficiaries. Positive Developments for Beneficiary Access Among the bright spots in the proposed rule is legislation aimed at improving public access to risk adjustment data. By enhancing transparency in how plans are paid, these changes may help combat overpayment issues, ensuring funds are utilized effectively. This level of access is crucial for researchers and advocates alike, seeking to optimize health care resources. Additionally, the rule proposes streamlining access to Special Enrollment Periods (SEPs) for beneficiaries when their health care providers leave their network. This policy could promote continuity of care and beneficiary choice, allowing individuals to stay with their preferred providers without unnecessary disruptions. Acknowledging the Needs of Dual Eligible Special Needs Plans (D-SNPs) The proposal also addresses the needs of dual eligible beneficiaries by relaxing forthcoming requirements for D-SNPs in states like New York. By supporting integration between Medicare and Medicaid, the changes aim to offer more cohesive care to those most in need. However, stakeholders urge CMS to ensure plans provide genuinely integrated services. The Pitfalls of Potential Rollbacks Despite these advancements, a significant concern arises around the potential rollbacks of marketing limitations within the proposed rule. Current guidelines restrict marketers from blurring lines between educational opportunities and sales pitches, a safeguard that prevents misleading tactics that could lead beneficiaries to make uninformed decisions. Critics assert that if these rollback proposals are accepted, this would allow the exploitation of vulnerable populations, wherein aggressive marketing tactics could replace objective information sources. Moreover, proposals to cease requirements for sharing critical enrollment information, as well as the elimination of support from State Health Insurance Assistance Programs (SHIPs), could further isolate Medicare beneficiaries from reliable assistance. As many seniors rely on these unbiased programs for guidance, their removal raises significant alarms regarding the potential for increased misinformation. Fighting Misinformation: The Role of Accurate Communication To navigate the complexities of Medicare, beneficiaries need access to clear and straightforward information regarding their choices and rights. The proposals aiming to withdraw notifications about unused supplemental benefits or prior authorization assessments from plans further jeopardize beneficiaries’ understanding. Ensuring accountability within these plans, especially related to prior authorization processes and claims decisions, is paramount to effective care delivery. The National Conversation: Accountability and Transparency The Center for American Progress (CAP) echoes calls for CMS to hold Medicare Advantage plans accountable for practices that compromise care quality through aggressive upcoding and predatory marketing strategies. In their recent comments to CMS, they emphasize the need for reforms that enhance health equity and hold plans accountable for care delays induced by complicated prior authorization systems. Supporting Beneficiaries in a Changing Landscape As discussions intensify regarding the future of Medicare Advantage, stakeholders are urged to advocate for policies that prioritize beneficiaries' rights and well-being. The challenges that seniors face in navigating Medicare can often turn into overwhelming obstacles that lead to unmet health care needs. For independent physicians, nurse practitioners, and small health care providers entwined in the evolution of Medicare, understanding the proposed changes is vital. They hold a key role in guiding beneficiaries through their options and ensuring they receive the care they richly deserve. Conclusion: Empowering Medicare Beneficiaries Ultimately, as Medicare continues to evolve, the voices of beneficiaries must remain at the forefront of discussions. Supporting efforts to keep beneficiaries informed, ensuring transparency in coverage options, and advocating for their rights are all actions that health care providers and advocates must undertake. Together, we can push for a Medicare system that serves the people it was intended to support the most. Join us in advocating for a better Medicare framework that values transparency, accessibility, and integrity. The time for action is now; together, we can protect the needs of the Medicare population.

01.28.2026

Navigating Medicare Home Health Care: What You Need To Know

Update Unpacking Medicare's Home Health Care Coverage For older adults and those grappling with disabilities, Medicare's home health care services are more than just a benefit—they are often a lifeline. With the demands of everyday life, many families are seeking information on how they can best access these crucial services to support their loved ones in a home environment. In this guide, we will explore key aspects of Medicare’s home health care coverage, eligibility criteria, and recent trends affecting service delivery. What Home Health Care Is and Isn't Medicare covers a variety of essential health and social services for seniors and individuals with disabilities in their homes, but it is critical to understand the limitations of this coverage. To qualify for home health care, one must reside at home, be considered homebound, and require skilled services like nursing or therapy. In essence, while Medicare helps with costs associated with skilled nursing, therapy, and some medical supplies, it does not extend to custodial care or personal tasks such as meal preparation or housekeeping. Understanding these boundaries is vital for caregivers like Sarah, supporting elder relatives who may be struggling. Home health care eligibility hinges on specific conditions: a doctor must certify a patient’s need for skilled services, generally through a face-to-face meeting. This often leads to confusion—people must know what types of services Medicare actually covers before engaging with healthcare providers. Understanding the 'Homebound' Status Being considered "homebound" doesn’t imply complete immobility. Instead, it refers to the challenges one faces when attempting to leave their home. Most importantly, this assessment is about effort and not simply lack of transportation. Factors considering this status include the need for assistance from others when going out for medical visits or errands, as well as the physical limitations that contribute to the difficulty of leaving home. This aspect resonates deeply with many families and caregivers. For instance, a retiree recovering from a hip replacement might be enabled by home health care services to regain mobility in a comfortable setting. By closely monitoring such cases, caregivers can better navigate Medicare benefits to ensure necessary support without undue financial burden. Eligibility and Certification Process The process of receiving Medicare home health care involves several steps that must all align for coverage to be granted. First, an applicant must demonstrate that they are enrolled in either Medicare Part A or B. Following this, a physician’s evaluation must confirm the need for skilled services, documented through a detailed care plan outlining service frequency, objectives, and required equipment. However, it’s important to note that while Medicare generally covers health care services, it does not extend to long-term custodial care or 24-hour supervision. In cases where regular updates to the patient’s condition and care plan are not maintained, families could face challenges in receiving continued care, making awareness of procedural requirements essential. Hurdles in Accessing Home Health Care Despite the existence of Medicare home health services, many families still encounter significant hurdles. For instance, obtaining approval for care can sometimes be an uphill battle. Common reasons for denial include insufficient proof of being homebound or lacking proper documentation of the patient's needs. Advocating effectively for one’s loved one requires diligence in maintaining health records and doctor’s notes to support claims. The recent push for better coverage highlights a growing demand for home health care in America, fueled by waiting lists for Medicaid home and community-based services (HCBS). Current proposals aim to address these gaps, but still, many are left wondering how to facilitate timely access to necessary services. The Future of Home Health Care under Medicare The landscape of Medicare home health care is continuously changing, with recent surveys indicating that there is a profound demand for home-based services. As we transition into 2026, ongoing adjustments to payment structures are expected; however, many fundamental rules regarding eligibility will likely remain stable. Looking ahead, Medicare has opportunities to expand its coverage, addressing the needs of the aging population more comprehensively. There’s a strong push for Medicare to reflect on how home health care complements aging in place—allowing seniors to remain in their homes while receiving the necessary medical and social support. Taking Action: Navigating Medicare’s Home Health Care Benefits For those perplexed by the intricacies of Medicare home health care, being well-informed enables better decision-making for family caretakers and health providers alike. Engaging in candid discussions with healthcare specialists while meticulously documenting and tracking all care needs helps streamline access to Medicare’s various associated benefits. Additionally, caregivers should consider leveraging technology and resources to maximize operational efficiency within their home care plans. Solutions range from telehealth to remote monitoring programs, enhancing patient engagement and improving overall care coordination. Conclusion: Your Rights and Responsibilities as a Medicare Beneficiary As a Medicare beneficiary or caregiver, it's essential to understand not just your rights and responsibilities, but also to remain proactive in addressing any barriers you may encounter along the way. Ensure you engage with your healthcare provider regularly and stay abreast of any changes in Medicare policies to safeguard your access to necessary care. As you navigate this often-complex system, remember that being empowered through knowledge enables you to create the best support structure for you or your loved ones. Advocate fiercely for the services you need—after all, the goal is to maintain health and wellness in the comfort of home.

01.23.2026

New Medicare Proposals Threaten Access to Gender-Affirming Care: What’s at Stake?

Update Recent Federal Proposals Target Transgender Healthcare In a significant escalation against transgender youth healthcare, the Biden administration unveiled three proposed rules that fundamentally challenge the current state of medical practice for this community. Released in late December 2025, these rules propose drastic changes affecting access to necessary medical services like puberty blockers and hormone replacement therapy (HRT), further complicating healthcare landscapes for practitioners and patients alike. A Legal Misstep: Challenging Established Rights The most concerning component of these proposals lies in their direct confrontation with legal precedents set by the Fourth Circuit Court in 2022. The court ruled that gender dysphoria is indeed categorized as a disability under the Rehabilitation Act, which prohibits discrimination based on disability. However, the proposed changes would effectively deny this classification, undermining the rights and healthcare access of transgender individuals. By attempting to redefine existing law, this proposal not only encroaches on the authority of healthcare providers but also on the fundamental rights of marginalized groups. Weaponizing Medicare: Impacts on Medical Practice At the heart of these proposed changes is the weaponization of Medicare and Medicaid to impose limitations on medical practitioners. A second proposal seeks to penalize healthcare providers who deliver gender-affirming care, directly affecting their reimbursement eligibility. Should these proposals be enacted, hospitals could face exclusion from federal funding if they provide essential, evidence-based care that aligns with the needs of their patients. These regulatory attempts also illustrate a potential overreach that could reconfigure how healthcare is provided across various states. For example, in Texas, similar bans initiated through state legislation have already forced healthcare providers to migrate out of the state or cease providing essential care altogether, thereby restricting options for both adults and minors. The Collateral Damage of Discriminatory Policy Healthcare experts assert that denying medically necessary treatment for transgender youth not only affects immediate care but also sets a troubling precedent for all medical services. By politicizing treatment options based on gender identity, these proposals threaten the integrity of the medical practice and could discourage healthcare providers from delivering comprehensive care, further exacerbating existing inequalities. The American Medical Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and other leading medical bodies have long supported the need for gender-affirming healthcare as a critical component of overall patient wellness. The risk is high that, by vilifying such treatments, both providers and patients will face increased pressure and scrutiny that stands to reverse years of medical advocacy and research. What Can Be Done? Mobilizing for Change The fight against these proposed regulations requires collective action from healthcare practitioners, advocates, and the wider community. As these rules go through a public comment period, which will culminate by February 17, 2026, all stakeholders are encouraged to voice their opinions. Whether through personal anecdotes about the impact of gender-affirming care or general statements on the importance of unbiased health services, every comment contributes to a broader resistance against discriminatory policies. Healthcare providers, particularly those in independent practices or small clinics, are urged to speak out on the necessity of Medicaid and Medicare funding to sustain their services. Raising awareness of how these changes can compromise patient outcomes and medical ethics will play a crucial role in shaping policy debates going forward. The Path Forward: Upholding Care Ethics and Rights In navigating this complex landscape, it’s essential to advocate not only for the rights of transgender individuals but for the medicinal autonomy of healthcare providers themselves. As regulations tighten, the need for practitioners to operate without undue governmental interference becomes paramount. The onus is upon policymakers to create systems that foster safe, high-quality, and affordable healthcare for all, rather than restricting access based on political motives. The proposed rules signal a strategic attempt to harness administrative power, posing risks to the healthcare system's integrity. With collective advocacy, we can push back against policies that threaten the well-being of vulnerable populations and ensure that the right to comprehensive, evidence-based healthcare remains protected.

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Core Modal Title

Sorry, no results found

You Might Find These Articles Interesting

T
Please Check Your Email
We Will Be Following Up Shortly
*
*
*